Skip to content
Prysm Edge
Book a Free Audit
Methodology

The BUILD
Framework

Engineered certainty, not trial-and-error.
Our proven five-phase approach transforms how buildings are retrofitted.

Why Projects Fail

Most building automation projects fail not because of technical complexity, but because of poor process.

Traditional contractors treat retrofits like new builds: show up, install equipment, hope it works, leave when the punch list is "complete." No systematic benchmarking. No root cause analysis. No measurement of actual outcomes against promised savings.

The result? Projects that run over budget, over schedule, and under-deliver on performance.

The Solution: BUILD

A five-phase framework honed over 300+ combined years of project experience, designed specifically for the unique challenges of brownfield building integration.

  • B Benchmark
  • U Understand
  • I Integrate
  • L Learn
  • D Drive
BUILD METHODOLOGY — LIFECYCLE OF A RETROFIT B PHASE 01 Benchmark Measure everything first 2–4 WEEKS U PHASE 02 Understand Find the root cause 3–5 WEEKS I PHASE 03 Integrate 72-hour site deployment 14d PREP + 72h SITE L PHASE 04 Learn Monitor & tune continuously 6–12 MONTHS D PHASE 05 Drive Prove and own the ROI ONGOING PRYSM EDGE — IPMVP COMPLIANT METHODOLOGY

Figure 1.1: The Lifecycle of a Retrofit

B
Phase 1

Benchmark

"You Can't Improve What You Don't Measure"

The Benchmark phase establishes the performance baseline of your building systems before we touch anything. This isn't a walkthrough with a clipboard—it's a comprehensive technical assessment using calibrated instrumentation and industry-standard protocols.

System Inventory

Complete as-built documentation, I/O mapping, and software history.

Energy Profiling

2-4 weeks baseline data, load profiles, and end-use breakdown.

Protocol Mapping

Identify BACnet/Modbus, IP schemes, and gateway locations.

Delta-T Analysis

Supply/return temps, flow imbalances, and pump staging.

127 controllers
discovered
network-scan.log
Scan in progress — 92% complete
● BACnet MS/TP 127 controllers
● Modbus RTU 34 meters
● KNX/IP 12 panels
● BACnet/IP 8 gateways
⚠ Orphaned nodes 3 flagged
DELIVERABLES: Inventory · Baseline · Topology · Opportunity Register
Topology map generated — 2–4 weeks
U
Phase 2

Understand

"Root Cause Analysis, Not Symptom Chasing"

We dig into *why* systems are underperforming. We don't accept "the chiller is old" as an explanation—we find the actual engineering root cause. This phase separates genuine equipment failure from poor control or insufficient maintenance.

Root Cause Diagnostics

Control logic analysis, thermal imaging, and hydronic balancing.

Integration Feasibility

Legacy compatibility, OT/IT security, and gateway needs.

Control Strategy

Optimized sequences, FDD rules, and energy modeling.

Financial Modeling

ROI calculation, payback period, and lifecycle analysis.

9 root causes
identified
diagnostic-report.pdf
Root Cause Analysis — Draft
CRITICAL Chiller staging logic error
CRITICAL Sensor drift on AHU-04
HIGH Delta-T collapse: 5.2°F
HIGH Loop hunting: VAV-12 bank
+ 5 additional findings...
DELIVERABLES: RCA · Control Strategy · Architecture · Pro Forma
Fix: VFD retrofit + sequence rewrite — 3–5 weeks
I
Phase 3

Integrate

"72 Hours On-Site, Not 14 Days"

By using our Remote Lab, we replicate your network and validate every sequence off-site. We eliminate the chaos of live building commissioning.

Lab
Site

Remote Lab (Prep)

  • • System replication
  • • Protocol validation
  • • Sequence testing
  • • Client witness test

On-Site (72 Hours)

  • • Physical install
  • • Cutover & commissioning
  • • Optimization
  • • Handover
72h on-site
deployment
integration-status.live
LAB PHASE
Replication
Validation
Sign-off
14 days prep
SITE PHASE
Cutover
◯ Commission
◯ Handover
72 hours live
DELIVERABLES: Lab Report · As-Builts · Commissioning · Training
Day 1 site cutover — live commissioning active
L
Phase 4

Learn

"Continuous Commissioning, Not One-Time Tuning"

Buildings drift. We stay. The Learn phase is a 6-12 month period of active monitoring, anomaly detection, and iterative tuning to ensure savings persist as season and occupancy change.

Continuous Cx

Daily monitoring, drift identification, and loop tuning.

Anomaly Detection

FDD algorithms for faults, sensor failures, and conflicts.

Operator Enablement

Monthly training, SOP creation, and troubleshooting guides.

Measurement & Verif.

IPMVP-compliant savings reports and persistence checks.

99% uptime at
month 6
performance-trend.csv
System Uptime — 6 Month Trend
Month 1
82%
Month 2
91%
Month 3
94%
Month 4
97%
Month 6
99%
DELIVERABLES: Monthly Reports · Quarterly Cx · M&V (IPMVP) · Training
EUI ↓18% vs baseline — 6–12 months active monitoring
D
Phase 5

Drive

"Validated ROI, Ongoing Optimization"

The Drive phase transitions ownership to you, backed by verified, documented ROI. We allow you to take the savings to the CFO with confidence.

Performance Tracking

Quarterly scorecards and KPI tracking (EUI, Uplift).

ROI Validation

Annual savings audit and investor-grade reports.

1.1M AED saved
annually
roi-dashboard.live
ROI Dashboard — Year 1
AED Savings To Date
1,100,000 ▲
PAYBACK PROGRESS 2.1 / 2.2 yrs
Energy ↓
23%
Delta-T ↑
+4.8°F
DELIVERABLES: ROI Report · 5-yr Roadmap · Seasonal Cx
Validated ROI — investor-grade documentation · Ongoing
The Difference

Why BUILD Works When Others Don't

Aspect Traditional Approach BUILD Methodology
Baseline Rough estimate, no measurement Instrumented 2-4 week baseline
Design Vendor-driven, product-focused Engineering-driven, outcome-focused
Testing Live commissioning on-site Full validation in Remote Lab
Deployment 2-3 weeks on-site chaos 72 hours pre-staged execution
Training 2-hour walkthrough Ongoing enablement (12 months)
Verification None (trust us!) IPMVP-compliant M&V
Outcome Hopeful promises Validated, documented ROI
Proven in the Field

See BUILD Methodology
In the Real World

Every BUILD engagement follows the same five-phase framework — and leaves behind verified, documented results. Browse our completed projects to see benchmark data, energy reductions, and payback periods achieved through the BUILD process.

View Our Projects
60–80%
Cost saving versus full replacement across our project portfolio
5
Phases. 100% lab-validated before a single engineer sets foot on site
25%+
Average energy reduction achieved in Year 1 across retrofit projects
Zero
Operational disruptions across every BUILD deployment
Browse projects

See BUILD in Action

Every project we undertake follows this proven framework. No shortcuts, no surprises, no unvalidated promises.